Newsom Under Federal Investigation After Fatal Crash Linked to Illegally Issued Commercial License

USDOT has placed direct responsibility on California Governor Gavin Newsom’s for allowing a 21-year-old asylum seeker to upgrade his commercial driving privileges despite newly enacted federal restrictions.ays later, the driver caused a highway crash that killed three people and left two others hospitalized

The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) has placed direct responsibility on California Governor Gavin Newsom’s administration for allowing a 21-year-old asylum seeker to upgrade his commercial driving privileges despite newly enacted federal restrictions. Days later, the driver caused a highway crash that killed three people and left two others hospitalized — an incident federal officials described as “entirely preventable.”

The case has ignited a nationwide debate over highway safety, the issuance of commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs) to non-citizens, and mounting tensions between federal safety regulations and California’s immigration-aligned licensing policies.

Federal Report Accuses California of Violating Emergency CDL Regulations

A newly released USDOT report, led by Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy, alleges that the State of California “knowingly failed” to comply with updated Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) standards governing non-domiciled commercial licenses.

According to the report, a post-incident federal audit found that approximately one in four CDL licenses issued to non-domiciled drivers in California were improperly granted, without meeting mandatory federal verification requirements.

The FMCSA had issued an emergency directive on September 26, 2025, requiring states to:

Suspend issuance or modification of non-domiciled CDLs until verification systems aligned with federal standards.
Deny CDL eligibility to asylum applicants pending verified immigration clearance.
Use the federal SAVE database to confirm lawful status.
Identify, revoke, and reissue improperly issued licenses under updated federal criteria.

California was formally notified of these obligations and instructed to halt further updates or renewals until full compliance was assured. However, according to the investigation, the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) continued processing privilege upgrades for foreign nationals without applying the mandatory federal restrictions.

A Timeline of Errors Leading to a Deadly Outcome

One of the reviewed cases was that of Jashanpreet Singh, a 20-year-old asylum applicant who received a restricted non-domiciled CDL on June 27, 2025.

On October 15, 2025 — the day Singh turned 21 — the California DMV removed his “K restriction,” which had limited his CDL use to in-state operations. Under FMCSA’s emergency rule, this upgrade qualified as a “significant privilege enhancement” and should have triggered a full federal eligibility assessment, which would have resulted in license denial due to Singh’s pending asylum status.

Instead, the DMV processed the modification without review under the new federal standards.

Six days later, on October 21, 2025, Singh was driving a semi-truck under the influence of narcotics when he crashed into vehicles stopped on a California highway. Three people were killed, and two others were transported to the hospital in critical condition.

USDOT concluded that the collision was “entirely preventable had the State of California complied with federal law.”

Federal Officials Blame Newsom Administration Directly

Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy publicly condemned the state’s handling of CDL enforcement under Governor Newsom, stating:

“This would never have happened if Gavin Newsom had followed the new rules. California violated federal law, and now three people are dead and two are hospitalized. These families deserve justice. There will be consequences.”

The report further states that California “failed to act with urgency” despite being explicitly warned about systemic noncompliance.

California Faces Federal Sanctions and Legal Exposure

Under current federal enforcement mechanisms, California now has 30 days to:

Conduct a full internal audit of its non-domiciled CDL issuance system.
Flag and review all active licenses issued under pre-rule criteria.
Revoke improperly upgraded or issued licenses.
Implement mandatory SAVE-based immigration verification for all renewals and modifications.

Failure to comply may result in:

Loss of delegated federal licensing authority.
Regulatory sanctions and funding penalties.
Lawsuits related to gross negligence and regulatory failure.
Federal oversight or preemption of CDL issuance within the state.

A National Flashpoint on Immigration, Safety, and State vs. Federal Authority

The incident has already become a catalyst in a widening national debate over:

Whether asylum seekers and non-citizens should hold commercial driving privileges.
The role of states in regulating commercial transportation under federal safety mandates.
The legal liability of state governments for authorizing high-risk operators.
Public safety versus inclusionary licensing policies.

The October 21 tragedy has placed California at the center of scrutiny from lawmakers, transportation associations, and victims’ rights groups, raising critical questions about accountability, compliance, and the intersecting roles of federal law, immigration policy, and highway safety.