Llame al (888) 572-7520 para hablar con un agente

U.S. DOT announces interim final rule banning race- and sex-based contracting requirements in federal grants.

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has issued a statement declaring an Interim Final Rule (IFR) that prohibits contracting requirements based on race and sex within federal grant programs, reaffirming its commitment to civil rights and the responsible use of taxpayer funds.

As a result of this move, the federal government will be withholding $18 billion allocated to the reconstruction projects in New York, specifically the Hudson Tunnel and the Second Avenue Subway, according to the statement released by the DOT.

El DOT suspende financiación federal en Nueva York por revisión de los derechos civiles
Wirestock, via freepik.com

DOT administrative review: rejection of the DBE program

The Department of Transportation has launched an administrative review of two key infrastructure projects to determine whether they are implementing unconstitutional practices. Until the review is completed, federal reimbursements will be suspended, the agency reported. However, the IFR announcement came just hours after the government shutdown was enacted, which could further delay the process and leave both projects stuck in bureaucratic limbo.

The Department is focusing on these projects because they are among the largest infrastructure initiatives in the country, and the American public is expecting quick and efficient results. Nevertheless, the progress of these projects is on hold until the DOT completes its expedited review.

Secretary Duffy’s position on the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program is unequivocal. According to statements from both Duffy and the Department, “subsidizing infrastructure contracts with taxpayer money based on discriminatory principles is unconstitutional, contrary to civil rights laws, and a misuse of public resources.”

The DBE program was created by the DOT over 20 years ago with the aim of promoting the participation of small businesses that are socially and economically disadvantaged in federally funded transportation projects. However, the Department argues that many of these projects involve workers who are undocumented or have pending immigration status. While the program was intended to create more equitable conditions, the DOT asserts that federal funds should not be used to favor individuals who are not U.S. citizens.

DOT suspends federal funding in New York amid civil rights review
Jcomp, via freepik.com

Federal friction

This situation highlights the ongoing tensions between federal funding requirements and local practices, as the DOT seeks to enforce civil rights standards while navigating a politically charged environment. As the review progresses, the American public continues to await the efficient and effective completion of these critical infrastructure projects.

“This is yet another unfortunate consequence of the reckless decision by radical Democrats to hold the federal government hostage in order to grant benefits to illegal immigrants, the Department of Transportation stated in its release.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

All content and original artwork, unless otherwise noted, is protected by copyright. Saint George uses certain images under license from various licensing vendors for this purpose. Any unauthorized commercial reproduction or distribution of copyrighted materials is prohibited.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business hours: Monday to Friday from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM. California time
Leave your number and a member of our company will contact you
Horario de atención: Lunes a viernes de 8.00 AM a 5.00 PM. Hora california

Deje su número y un miembro de nuestra empresa se pondrá en contacto con usted

Privacy summary

This website uses cookies so that we can offer you the best possible user experience. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our website or helping our team understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

More information about the privacy policy: Privacy Policy

More information about the terms of use: Terms of use 

More information about the disclaimer: Disclaimer 

More information on acceptable use policies: Acceptable Use Policies